ABSTRACT
OBJETIVO: Avaliar o desempenho diagnóstico da citologia obtida pela CPER, aquele obtido pela EE-PAAF e a concordância entre patologistas gerais (PG) e especialistas (PE) em pacientes com estenose biliar. MÉTODOS: Incluímos pacientes com estenose biliar identificados pela CPER. A EE-PAAF foi realizada apenas em áreas com efeito de massa ou da parede espessada do ducto biliar. O padrão-ouro foi a cirurgia, histologia e/ou o seguimento. As amostras teciduais foram consideradas: malignas, suspeitas, atípicas, insuficientes ou benignas. Os espécimes obtidos por cada método foi interpretado (cego) por um PG e outro PE. RESULTADO: 46 pacientes foram incluídos (37 malignos e 9 benignos). O diagnóstico final foi de tumor pancreático (26), biliar (11), pancreatite crônica (8) e estenose inflamatória do ducto biliar (1). Sensibilidade e acurácia da CPER foram 43,2 por cento e 52,2 por cento para o PG e 51,4 por cento e 58,7 por cento para o PE. Sensibilidade e acurácia da EE-PAAF foi 52,8 por cento e 58,5 por cento para o PG e 69,4 por cento e 73,2 por cento para o PE. A combinação entre a CPER e EE-PAAF demonstrou maior sensibilidade e acurácia para ambos PG (64,9 por cento e 69,6 por cento) e PE (83,8 por cento e 84,8 por cento), respectivamente. CONCLUSÃO: A citologia obtida pelo escovado da via biliar durante a CPER e as amostras teciduais colhidas pela EE-PAAF tem rendimento semelhante para o diagnóstico das estenoses biliares. No entanto, a combinação dos métodos resulta em uma maior acurácia. Além disso, espera-se que a interpretação das amostras ocorra com maior precisão pelo PE se comparado ao PG.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and to compare the diagnostic yield of ERCP brush cytology (ERCP) and EUS-FNA in patients with biliary strictures and evaluates the agreement between general pathologists (GP) and expert GI pathologists (GIP) in the final diagnosis of biliary strictures. METHODS: Patients with biliary strictures documented by ERCP were included. Brush cytology was performed and during EUS, only visible mass lesions or localized bile duct wall thickening were aspirated. The gold standard method for diagnosis was surgical histology and/or follow-up. Tissue sampling results were: malignant, suspicious, atypical, insufficiently or benign. Specimens were interpreted by GP and GIP, blinded for prior tests results. RESULTS: 46 patients were included. Final diagnosis was malignancy in 37 (26 pancreatic - 11 biliary) and benign in 9 (8 chronic pancreatitis - 1 common bile duct inflammatory stricture). Sensitivity and accuracy for ERCP brush cytology were 43.2 percent and 52.2 percent for GP and 51.4 percent and 58.7 percent for GIP. Sensitivity and accuracy for EUS-FNA were 52.8 percent and 58.5 percent, respectively for GP and 69.4 percent e 73.2 percent for GIP. In comparison, the combination of brush cytology and EUS-FNA demonstrated higher sensitivity and accuracy for both GP (64.9 percent and 69.6 percent, respectively) and GIP (83.8 percent and 84.8 percent, respectively) and improved agreement with final diagnosis for both (mostly for GIP). CONCLUSION: Both, ERCP brush cytology and EUS-FNA has a similar yield for the diagnosis of biliary strictures. However, the combination of these methods results in an improved diagnostic accuracy. In addition, GIP might be expected to interpret specimens with greater accuracy than GP.
Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Biliary Tract Diseases/diagnosis , Biliary Tract Neoplasms/diagnosis , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Endosonography , Biopsy, Fine-Needle , Diagnosis, Differential , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
One hundred and twenty five patients with virus B or C chronic active hepatitis and postnecrotic cirrhosis and different degrees of liver dysfunction were studied. AIM: 1) To determine a thyroid hormonal profile; 2) to evaluate the prognostic value of these tests in relation to the progression of the disease and mortality; 3) compare these findings with Child-Pugh classification. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The patients were divided in four groups: a) 31 with chronic active hepatitis; b) 41 with postnecrotic cirrhosis Child A; c) 35 with postnecrotic cirrhosis Child B and d) 18 with postnecrotic cirrhosis Child C. The protocol comprised serum measurements of albumin and bilirrubin, estimates of prothrombin time and clinical evaluation of ascites and encephalopathy, measurement of total serum triiodothyronine, thyroxine, thyroid-stimulating hormone, free thyroxine, reverse triiosothyronine, calculated rT3/T3 index (IrT3) and thyrotropin-releasing hormone test. RESULTS: Total serum triiodothyromnine showed the most significant difference among the groups, gradually lower as the disease became more advanced (CAH: 149.2 +/- 42.3 ng/dL; PNC-A: 137.4 +/- 37.2 ng/dL; PNC-B: 88.0 +/- 28.4 ng/dL and PNC-C: 41.8 +/- 21.9 ng/dL). Low levels of T4 (4.5 +/- 2.0 micrograms/dL) and FT4 (0.7 +/- 0.4 ng/dL) and elevated levels of thyroid-stimulating hormone (7.2 +/- 11.5 microIU/mL), reverse triiosothyronine (60.8 +/- 52.1 ng/dL) and calculated rT3/T3 index (2.2 +/- 2.6) were more frequent in patients with postnecrotic cirrhosis Child C. Thyrotropin-releasing hormone test was normal in the majority of the patients. CONCLUSION: The present study shows a positive relationship between the low serum levels of T3 and elevated serum levels of rT3 and IrT3/T3 with the degree of hepatic dysfunction according to the Child-Pugh classification